TOPIC

Valuation Allowances under ASC 740

July 29, 2022

ASC 740 governs how companies recognize the effects of income taxes on their financial statements under U.S. GAAP. This applies only to taxes based on income – not sales, payroll, or property taxes – per ASC 740-10.

Valuation allowances impact the ASC 740 provision for income tax required by U.S. GAAP. Like most tax provision subjects, correctly handling valuation allowances requires tax and accounting expertise.

Thankfully, practitioners no longer need to maintain cumbersome spreadsheets to document their assessment of whether a valuation allowance is required or calculate the allowance. Bloomberg Tax Provision offers a complete ASC 740 tax provision solution, allowing companies to easily handle valuation allowances.

What is a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets?

A valuation allowance is a mechanism that offsets a deferred tax asset account.

A company should perform the analysis after considering the two-step recognition standard regarding uncertain tax positions. All available evidence – both positive and negative – should be considered to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is needed. This is not a question of tax law, but a question of judgement regarding the company’s future.

For valuation allowances, the question is whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets can actually be utilized by the company.

A company may reach different conclusions in different tax jurisdictions concerning the need for a valuation allowance for the same entity or entities.

This video includes an overview of the basic accounting concepts for valuation allowances, including sources of taxable income, positive and negative evidence, and tax planning strategies. [18:55]

asc 740 guide cover

Download: The Essential Guide to ASC 740

This easy-to-use guide breaks down the steps and helps you navigate the biggest hurdles with background, details, and examples of how ASC 740 interacts with various tax laws and corporate facts.

When is a deferred tax asset valuation allowance required?

ASC 740-10-30-18 states that future realization of the tax benefit of an existing deductible temporary difference or carryforward ultimately depends on whether the company has sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character (for example, ordinary income or capital gain) within the carryback/carryforward period available under the tax law.

The following four possible sources of taxable income may be available under the tax law to realize a tax benefit for deductible temporary differences and carryforwards.

  1. Future reversals of existing temporary differences
  2. Future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards
  3. Taxable income in prior carryback year(s) if tax law permits carryback
  4. Tax planning strategies (see paragraph 740-10-30-19) that would, if necessary, be implemented to, for example:
    1. Accelerate taxable amounts to utilize expiring carryforwards
    2. Change the character of taxable or deductible amounts from ordinary income or loss to capital gain or loss
    3. Switch from tax-exempt to taxable investments

Tax planning strategies

According to ASC 740-10-55-39, a qualifying tax planning strategy is an action that:

  1. Is prudent and feasible. Management must have the ability to implement the strategy and expect to do so unless the need is eliminated in future years. For example, management would not have to apply the strategy if income earned in a later year uses the entire amount of carryforward from the current year.
  2. An entity ordinarily might not take but would take to prevent an operating loss or tax credit carryforward from expiring unused. All of the various strategies that are expected to be employed for business or tax purposes other than utilization of carryforwards that would otherwise expire unused are, for purposes of this Subtopic, implicit in management’s estimate of future taxable income and, therefore, are not tax planning strategies as that term is used in this Topic.
  3. Would result in the realization of deferred tax assets. The effect of qualifying tax planning strategies must be recognized when determining the amount of a valuation allowance.

When evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, tax planning strategies include:

  1. Elections for tax purposes
  2. Strategies that shift estimated future taxable income between years, and
  3. Strategies that shift the estimated pattern and timing of future reversals of temporary differences

A plan that involves the repatriation of earnings from an entity whose earnings meet the indefinite reversal criteria does not constitute a tax planning strategy.

The need to schedule temporary differences

In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, a company that cannot forecast future income may be required to schedule the reversal of temporary differences to determine the amount of deferred tax liabilities (DTLs) expected to offset the DTAs. The company should use a systematic and logical methodology to schedule the reversals. If no other sources of taxable income are available, the company should record a valuation allowance against the residual amount of DTAs that are not offset by DTLs in the scheduling exercise.

The 80% limitation on federal NOL utilization and the Section 163(j) interest deduction limitation, combined with the indefinite carryforward nature of those attributes, impact the way DTAs are scheduled to reverse.

A valuation allowance is recorded solely against DTAs, not DTLs. To the extent that DTLs will reverse and allow the company to utilize all its DTAs, no valuation allowance is recorded. Consequently, it is common for companies that have determined that a valuation allowance is necessary to record a valuation allowance equal to the amount that DTAs exceed DTLs.

Watch on demand: Valuation Allowances Webinar

Learn about the basic concepts of accounting for valuation allowances including the following topics: Sources of taxable income, Positive and negative evidence, and tax consequences of valuation allowances.

What evidence is used in a valuation allowance analysis?

According to ASC 740-10-30-22, examples (not prerequisites) of positive evidence that might support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed when there is negative evidence include, but are not limited to, the following:

  1. Existing contracts or firm sales backlog that will produce more than enough taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset based on existing sales prices and cost structures
  2. An excess of appreciated asset value over the tax basis of the entity’s net assets in an amount sufficient to realize the deferred tax asset
  3. A strong earnings history exclusive of the loss that created the future deductible amount (tax loss carryforward or deductible temporary difference) coupled with evidence indicating that the loss (for example, an unusual, infrequent, or extraordinary item) is an aberration rather than a continuing condition
valuation allowance evidence image

Negative evidence

Under ASC 740-10-30-21, forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative evidence such as cumulative losses in recent years. Other examples of negative evidence include, but are not limited to, the following:

  1. A history of operating loss or tax credit carryforwards expiring unused
  2. Losses expected in early future years (by a presently profitable entity)
  3. Unsettled circumstances that, if unfavorably resolved, would adversely affect future operations and profit levels on a continuing basis in future years
  4. A carryback, carryforward period that is so brief it would limit the realization of tax benefits if a significant deductible temporary difference is expected to reverse in a single year or the entity operates in a traditionally cyclical business

Weight given to positive and negative evidence

ASC 740-10-30-23 states that an entity shall use judgment in considering the relative impact of negative and positive evidence. The weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence shall be commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. The more negative evidence that exists, the more positive evidence is necessary, and the more difficult it is to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed for some portion or all of the deferred tax asset. A cumulative loss in recent years is a significant piece of negative evidence that is difficult to overcome.

According to ASC 740-10-30-24, future realization of a tax benefit sometimes will be expected for a portion, but not all of a deferred tax asset and the dividing line between the two portions may be unclear. In those circumstances, application of judgment based on a careful assessment of all available evidence is required to determine the portion of a deferred tax asset for which it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.

In practice, companies will often record a valuation allowance in a period in which they report a cumulative pretax loss, adjusted for permanent items, based on the previous 12 quarters of activity. A company in that situation will typically not consider forecasts of future income as positive evidence.

Valuation allowances and share-based compensation

With respect to DTAs associated with share-based awards, the existence of underwater options (i.e., options where the exercise price exceeds fair value) is not negative evidence in considering the need for a valuation allowance. However, if a deferred tax asset associated with underwater options is material, it should be disclosed.

asc 740 content hum screenshot

Become an expert: ASC 740 Resource Center

Bloomberg Tax offers a variety of resources to assist companies with ASC 740, recognizing the effects of income taxes on their financial statements.

How are valuation allowances accounted for under ASC 740?

If the determination is made that a valuation allowance is necessary, the existence of DTLs related to indefinite-lived intangibles will result in a situation where the valuation allowance recognized either exceeds the amount of any net DTA or requires the recognition of a valuation allowance for a company in a net DTL position.

Release of valuation allowance

A valuation allowance should be reversed in the period in which the positive evidence outweighs the negative evidence. The reversal of the valuation allowance will be recorded as a deferred income tax benefit.

A company should give significant attention to the appropriate timing of releasing a valuation allowance. Companies should particularly focus on the interim period in which evidence becomes known or knowable with respect to the recognition or reversal of a valuation allowance.

No backward tracing to other comprehensive income

Certain items are recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI) rather than the income statement. These items include currency translation adjustments (CTAs), pension and post-retirement actuarial gains and losses and amortization of prior service costs, and unrealized gains and losses on available for sale (AFS) securities, among other items.

To the extent a valuation allowance is established against an item recorded to the OCI, the valuation allowance will not be recorded to OCI but instead will be recorded to income tax expense.

Interim reporting

For interim reporting, if a portion of the valuation allowance recorded or removed relates to current year activity (i.e., earnings, permanent items, and reversals of temporary items), that amount is included in the annual effective tax rate calculation rather than adjusted discretely. Conversely, the amount of valuation allowance that relates to past and future earnings is released as a discrete item.

tax provision product screenshot

See our tool: Calculate accurate provisions

The most powerful ASC 740 calculation software on the market, Bloomberg Tax Provision, solves the technical and process issues involved in calculating your income tax provision.

Examples of ASC 740 valuation allowances

The following videos provide examples for accounting for valuation allowances under ASC 740.


Example 1: Full U.S. Valuation Allowance

This ASC 740 example includes a single U.S entity with a single state income tax return. The U.S. entity has a history of losses and has concluded that a valuation allowance is required against its net deferred tax assets. The U.S. entity owns a CFC that has a history of profitability. [12:15]

Example 2: U.S. Valuation Allowance Release

This ASC 740 example includes a single U.S entity with a single state income tax return. The U.S. entity has a history of losses but has become profitable and has concluded that a valuation allowance is no longer required against its net deferred tax assets. The U.S. entity owns a CFC that has a history of profitability. [9:13]

Example 3: Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) Full Valuation Allowance

This ASC 740 example includes a single U.S entity with a single state income tax return. The U.S. entity owns a CFC with a history of losses and has concluded that a valuation allowance is required against its net deferred tax assets. [10:03]

Example 4: CFC Valuation Allowance Release

This ASC 740 example includes a single U.S entity with a single state income tax return. The U.S. entity owns a CFC. The CFC has a history of losses but has become profitable and has concluded that a valuation allowance is no longer required against its net deferred tax assets. This example discusses the interim impacts of the valuation release regarding the component recognized in the Annual Effective Tax Rate versus as a discrete item. [8:02]

Example 5: U.S. Valuation Allowance Release

This ASC 740 example includes a single U.S entity with a single state income tax return. The U.S. entity has a history of losses but has become profitable and has concluded that a valuation allowance is no longer required against its net deferred tax assets. This example discusses the interim impacts of the valuation release regarding the component recognized in the Annual Effective Tax Rate versus as a discrete item. The U.S. entity owns a CFC that has a history of profitability. [9:48]

Our customers are talking about Bloomberg Tax Provision

I’ve worked with tax software my entire career, and this program is a gem. It’s self-contained, simple, powerful, and efficient. Bloomberg Tax Provision does the prep right the first time. I can’t say enough good things about it.
Sherri Throop
Tax and Financial Reporting Manager
Novo Building Products
I’ve done implementations of other software, and this one was hands-down the easiest to get the hang of. It was just a matter of weeks before we had full implementation and recreation of our prior year provision ready to go.
Corporate Tax Manager
Flexential

Navigate the ASC 740 tax provision with confidence

Bloomberg Tax Financial Accounting brings expert context and unmatched content so that financial accounting professionals can navigate the nuances of U.S. GAAP with confidence. Access practitioner-authored analysis and interpretations in our Portfolios to help you develop and implement complex accounting strategies. Don’t have access? Request a demo.

Portfolio 5000: Accounting for Income Taxes — FASB ASC 740

This guide summarizes the accounting literature related to accounting for income taxes.

Portfolio 5109: Accounting for Share-Based Compensation

This portfolio provides a detailed analysis of the rules on share-based compensation contained in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718.

Portfolio 5002: Accounting for Income Taxes: Uncertain Tax Positions (FIN 48)

This guide provides a comprehensive analysis of the treatment of uncertain tax positions under the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Get in-depth guidance and industry perspectives on emerging accounting issues

How to calculate the ASC 740 tax provision

Understand the ASC 740 tax provision, how to calculate the provision for income tax, and how tax provision software can help practitioners.

ASC 740: Stock-Based Compensation

ASC 718 provides specific guidance on income tax accounting and clarifies how ASC 740 should be applied to stock-based compensation.

2022 Q3 Quarterly Outlook

Download our Q3 Quarterly Outlook now. It provides a comprehensive look at the economic and tax-related challenges affecting workflow automation, provision, state tax laws, and the...

See for yourself

Not a subscriber? Get the tax expertise and tools with our provision software and research platform– request pricing now.

Top
Join our Tax Regulatory Alerts for breaking news
Sending...

By clicking submit, I agree to the privacy policy.