From Implementation to Impact: Maximizing the Value of Tax Software

In this article, you’ll learn:

  • Why software implementations often fail to deliver full value
  • How integrated tax workflows reduce manual effort and risk
  • What certified implementation expertise adds beyond software deployment
  • How RSM helps organizations prepare for future regulatory change
  • Ways to maximize ROI from Bloomberg Tax over time

Corporate tax departments face a compounding set of demands. Regulatory changes seem to arrive faster than internal processes can absorb them, data needs to flow across systems that weren’t designed to communicate with one another, and leaders expect accuracy and efficiency from teams that are already stretched thin.

An integrated suite of tax tools can ease the pressure. However, the extent to which an organization benefits from the tools depends largely on how it deploys and configures the technology and how well it maintains it over time.

RSM US LLP is a member of the Certified Implementation Program for the Bloomberg Tax suite of solutions, including Fixed Assets, Provision, Research, and Workpapers. They’re not simply familiar with the products. They use them every day across a broad client base.

Here’s what that combination of technology and a sophisticated tax advisor delivers in practice, and why the implementation decision warrants as much deliberation as the software selection itself.

The hidden cost of “good enough” implementations

Consider state apportionment.

A blended model may be quicker to configure than a detailed entity-by-entity state model. For a team under deadline pressure, the simpler option might be sufficient for the current filing cycle.

However, it introduces the risk of error if the estimated blended state tax rate is not periodically refined or adequately supported.

Using the blended model may also create future limitations involving:

  • ASU 2023-09 compliance
  • State tax planning
  • Data granularity
  • AI readiness
  • Audit support and documentation

As state taxation increases in complexity with more adjustments from federal taxable income, the blended approach might result in a need for time-intensive reconciliations down the road.

An advisor that has implemented the suite across dozens of clients can make that trade-off explicit before the team finalizes the configuration decision.

Why configuration decisions matter

The same principle applies to provision calculations. Usually, deferred tax assets and liabilities are often imported into new software using the same structure they have always used internally. Little attention is given to whether data might be better structured to position the company for future changes within the business.

RSM approaches implementation differently.

Their teams trace data from its source through final disclosure, evaluating:

  • Data flow across systems
  • Calculation-to-disclosure mismatches
  • Control gaps and documentation requirements
  • Reporting and audit considerations
  • Long-term scalability needs

By addressing structural issues during implementation, organizations can reduce the need for manual adjustments at period-end.

How experienced implementers avoid future rework

This level of implementation quality is possible because the RSM professionals who configure and deploy the system are the same individuals who use it daily on client engagements. They’re not a standalone technology group trained on the software. They’re tax professionals for whom Bloomberg Tax is an operational tool.

Familiarity with the system across different industries, entity structures, filing footprints, and ERP environments translates into configuration decisions that account for edge cases a first-time implementer wouldn’t anticipate.

What’s more, professionals with deep technology backgrounds will also take into consideration best practices for tech use across the department.

As a result, they can address technical tax requirements during implementation rather than discovering shortcomings during review.

Key takeaway: Expert-led tax software implementation maximizes long-term value

The difference between a successful implementation and a successful tax transformation often comes down to configuration decisions made on day one.

Recommended for you